Docket No: 04-2277-02

DIECA Communications, Inc. Covad Communications, Inc. dba Covad Communications Company / Qwest Interconnection Agreement – Arbitration

Docket Index

Docket Number: 04-2277-02

In the Matter of: Covad Communications Company, for Arbitration to Resolve Issues Relating to an Interconnection Agreement with Qwest Corporation

38158

For questions regarding documents not linked call 801-530-6714

Date Description
April 27, 2004 Petition for Arbitration
Exhibit A – Draft Agreement
Exhibit B – Utah – Collocation
April 28, 2004 Action Request, Due: June 28, 2004
May 24, 2004 Response of Qwest Corporation to Covad’s Petition for Arbitration
May 24, 2004 Qwest’s Motion to Dismiss or, Alternatively, for Summary Judgement Relating to Portions of Issues Submitted by Covad Communications Company for Arbitration
May 24, 2004 Qwest’s Motion to Dismiss or, Alternatively, for Summary Judgment Relating to portions of Issues Submitted by Covad Communications Company for Arbitration
May 24, 2004 Motion for Entry of Protective Order
May 28, 2004 Protective Order
June 3, 2004 DIECA Communications, Inc., Response to Qwest’s Motion
June 9, 2004 Appendix A, Re: William Easton, James B. Farr, Robert Hubbard, Mary Rose Hughes, Philip A. Linse, Michael Norman, Laura Scholl, and Ted Smith
June 10, 2004 Exhibit A to Michael Zulevic’s Affidavit
June 16, 2004 Appendix A, Re: Karen Frame, Megan Doberneck, Mike Zulevic and Lynn Hankins
June 17, 2004 Appendix A, RE: Robert Brown and Renee Albersheim
June 18, 2004 Qwest’s Reply
Exhibit A
June 24, 2004 Notice of Scheduling Conference
June 24, 2004 Covad Communications’ Supplemental Filing
Exhibit A
Exhibit B
June 28, 2004 Appendix A, Re: Winslow Waxter
June 28, 2004 Qwest’s Notice of Withdrawal of Motion to Dismiss
June 29, 2004 Comments from DPU
July 6, 2004 Scheduling Order
September 17, 2004 Qwest’s Motion to Dismiss or, Alternatively, for Summary Judgment Relating to Portions of Issues Submitted by Covad Communications Company for Arbitration
October 4, 2004 Response to Qwest’s Motion to Dismiss Or, Alternatively, for Summary Judgment Relating to Portions of Issues Submitted by Covad Communications Company for Arbitration
Exhibit A Decision No. R04-0649-I
Exhibit B Minnesota – Order on Motion to Dismiss
Exhibit C
October 5, 2004 Correction of Two Previous Filings
October 8, 2004 Direct Testimony of Michael Norman
October 8, 2004 Direct Testimony of Karen Stewart
October 8, 2004 Direct Testimony of Renee Albersheim
Exhibit A RA-1
Exhibit B
Exhibit C
October 8, 2004 Direct Testimony of William Easton
Exhibit A
Exhibit B
October 8, 2004 Direct Testimony of Michael Zulevic
Exhibit A
Exhibit B MZ-2 – Qwest Response
Exhibit C
October 8, 2004 Direct Testimony of Megan Doberneck
Exhibit A
Exhibit B
Exhibit C
Exhibit D
Exhibit E
Exhibit F
Exhibit G – History Log
Exhibit H
Exhibit I
Exhibit J
Exhibit K
Exhibit L
October 13, 2004 Amended Direct Testimony of Megan Doberneck
October 14, 2004 Qwest’s Reply Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss Portions of Issues Submitted by Covad Communications for Arbitration
October 19, 2004 Appendix A, Re: John Devaney and Karen Stewart
October 25, 2004 Appendix A, Re: Stephen Mecham
October 25, 2004 Appendix A, Re: Elizabeth Balvin
November 12, 2004 Appendix A, Re: Chris Luras
November 12, 2004 Order Denying Motion to Dismiss Or, Alternatively, for Summary Judgment Relating to Portions of Issues Submitted by Covad Communications Company for Arbitration
November 12, 2004 Rebuttal Testimony of Megan Doberneck
Exhibit A
Exhibit B
Exhibit C
Exhibit D
November 12, 2004 Rebuttal Testimony of Michael Zulevic
November 12, 2004 Rebuttal Testimony of William Easton
Exhibit A
November 12, 2004 Rebuttal Testimony of Michael Norman
November 12, 2004 Rebuttal Testimony of Karen Stewart
November 12, 2004 Rebuttal Testimony of Renee Albersheim
Exhibit A – Qwest Wholesale Change Management Process Document
Exhibit B
Exhibit C
Exhibit D – Letter Re: Covad Escalation on Qwest’s position on setting aside funds and allocated hours for CLEC billing and repair changes
Exhibit E
Exhibit F
Exhibit G
Exhibit H – Deaveraged Rate Zone by Wire Center
November 15, 2004 Appendix A, RE: Peggy Egbert
November 24, 2004 Appendix A, Re: Lynn Stang
November 30, 2004 Letter filing from John Devany
December 3, 2004 Updated Issues Matrix
December 6, 2004 Letter from John Devaney to Judge Goodwill
December 6, 2004 Letter from Andrew Newell to Judge Goodwill
December 6, 2004 Appendix A, Re: Andrew Newell
December 9, 2004 Agreement Outline
December16, 2004 Replacement Pages for Exhibit Covad-1, Megan Doberneck’s Direct Testimony [PROPRIETARY]
January 5, 2005 Letter to Judge Goodwill from Robert Brown
January 11, 2005 Notice of Change of Address
January 21, 2005 DIECA Communications, Inc. d/b/a Covad Communications Company’s Post-Hearing Brief
January 21, 2005 Qwest’s Post-Hearing Brief
Exhibit A – Colorado – Decision No. C04-1037
Exhibit B – Minnesota – Arbitrator’s Report
Exhibit C – Washington – Arbitrator’s Report
Exhibit D – Colorado – Decision No. C04-1348
Exhibit E
Exhibit F – Meeting Agenda – OSS/Operational Impact Review Meeting 01-21-2000
January 21, 2005 Memorandum from DPU
Exhibit A – Summary of Colorado, Washington and Minnesota arbitration decisions resolving the exact same issues that are being debated in Utah.
January 28, 2005 Email Correspondence from Steven Goodwill to Ted Smith
February 7, 2005 Qwest’s Post-Hearing Response Brief
February 8, 2005 Arbitration Report and Order
February 9, 2005 Email Correspondences between Judge Goodwill and Parties
March 11, 2005 Covad Communications Company’s Petition for Review or Rehearing
Exhibit A
March 11, 2005 Qwest’s Motion for Review Seeking Clarification of a Portion of the Commission’s Arbitration Report and Order
April 4, 2005 Covad’s Response to Qwest’s Motion for Review
April 4, 2005 Qwest’s Opposition to Covad’s Petition for Rehearing
April 13, 2005 Order on Reconsideration
August 18, 2005 Filing of Arbitrated Interconnection Agreement
Exhibit A
Exhibit B
Exhibit C [SEE WHOLESALE WEBSITE]
Exhibit D [INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
Exhibit E [INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
Exhibit F
Exhibit G
Exhibit H [INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
Exhibit I
Exhibit J [INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
Exhibit K
Exhibit L
Exhibit M
August 22, 2005 Filing of Amendment to Arbitrated Interconnection Agreement
Line Splitting Amendment
Unbundled Network Elements – Utah
September 29, 2005 Action Request, due: ASAP
October 3, 2005 Comments from DPU
October 18, 2005 Correspondence from Gregory Monson
October 20, 2005 Correspondence from Julie Orchard

Share this: