Docket No: 01-049-75

Telecom

Docket Year: 2001

Beaver County et al. vs Qwest

Docket Index

Docket Number: 01-049-75

In the Matter of: the Formal Complaint of Beaver County, Box Elder County, Cache County, Carbon County, Davis County, Duchesne County, Emery County, Garfield County, Grand County, Iron County, Juab County, Kane County, Morgan County, Piute County, Rich County, Salt Lake County, Millard County, San Pete County, Sevier County, Summit County, Tooele County, Uintah County, Utah County, Wasatch County, Washington County, Wayne County, Weber County, and all other Persons or Entities Similarly Situated vs. Qwest Corporation fka US West Communications, Inc., fka Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Services, Inc.

26459

For questions regarding documents not linked call 801-530-6714

Date	Description
September 17, 2001	Formal Complaint and Request for Agency Action [PROPRIETARY]
September 20, 2001	Action Request: Due 10/08/01
October 9, 2001	Memo from DPU
October 17, 2001	Qwest’s Motion to Dismiss
November 16, 2001	Qwest’s Reply to Complainant’s Memorandum in Opposition to Qwest’s Motion to Dismiss
November 19, 2001	Complainant’s Memorandum in Opposition to Qwest’s Motion to Dismiss
December 11, 2001	Preliminary Response of the DPU to the Counties’ Complaint and Qwest’s Motion to Dismiss
January 7, 2002	Notice of Hearing
January 24, 2002	Motion for Continuance CCS
January 25, 2002	Committee of Consumer Services Response to Qwest’s Objection to the Committee’s Motion for Continuance
January 25, 2002	Qwest’s Objection to the Committee of Consumer Service’s Motion for a Continuance
January 28, 2002	Order Denying Motion for Continuance
July 19, 2002	Motion to Consolidate and Motion to Amend
July 19, 2002	Memorandum in Support of Motion to Consolidate and Motion to Amend
July 19, 2002	Amended Complaint, Proposed Class Action
July 26, 2002	Order Denying Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice and Establishing a Schedule and Procedures
August 5, 2002	Petition for Intervention of Utah Rural Telecom Association
August 9, 2002	Qwest’s Reply to Counties’ Motions to Amend and Consolidate
August 9, 2002	Qwest’s Answer to Amended Complaint and Motion to Dismiss
August 9, 2002	Response of the Committee of Consumer Services
August 15, 2002	Correspondence from Ted D. Smith
August 23, 2002	Qwest’s Reply to Committee on Motion to Amend and Consolidate
August 23, 2002	Reply Memorandum in Further Support or Motion to Consolidate and Motion to Amend
August 23, 2002	Motion to Strike “Qwest’s Answer to Amend and Complaint and Motion to Dismiss”
August 23, 2002	Reply of the Committee of Consumer Services and Division of Public Utilities
September 3, 2002	Complaint’s Memorandum in Opposition to Petition for Intervention of Utah Rural Telecom Association
September 9, 2002	Qwest’s Opposition to Counties’ Motion to Strike
September 9, 2002	Qwest’s Reply to the Counties’ Reply Memorandum on Motion to Consolidate
September 9, 2002	Qwest’s Reply to the CCS and DPU
September 30, 2002	Letter to the Parties of Record, PSC Docket No. 01-049-75
September 30, 2002	Notification of Withdrawal of Petition for Intervention of the Utah Rural Telecom Association
October 23, 2002	Motion for Entry of Protective Order
October 28, 2002	Protective Order
October 31, 2002	Appendix A, Re: David L. Elmont, Laura L. Scholl, Carol D. Sjoberg, Ted D. Smith, Gregory B. Monson
December 4, 2002	Appendix A, Re: Winslow F. Bouscaren
March 10, 2004	Appendix A, Re: Roxie McCullar, Thomas Regan, William Dunkel, and Oliwia Smith
March 16, 2004	Appendix A, Re: Daniel Gimble, Reed Warnick
July 6, 2004	Scheduling Order
July 14, 2004	Qwest’s Motion for Modification of Scheduling Order Exhibit A
July 21, 2004	Modified Scheduling Order on Qwest’s Motion for Modification of Scheduling Order
August 26, 2004	Qwest’s Motions for Protective Order on Notice of Rule 30(b)(6) Deposition Exhibit A Exhibit B
August 31, 2004	Complainants’ Motion for Modification of Scheduling Order
September 15, 2004	Qwest’s Response to Counties’ Motion for Modification of Scheduling Order
September 17, 2004	Complainants’ Memo in Opposition to Qwest’s Motion for Protective Order
September 17, 2004	Complainants’ Reply Memo in Further Support of their Motion for Modification of Scheduling Order
September 21, 2004	Order Denying Motion for Modification of Scheduling Order
September 30, 2004	Affidavit of David Scofield
September 30, 2004	Qwest’s Notice of Request for Further Consideration of Motions to Dismiss
September 30, 2004	Memo Supporting Complainants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
September 30, 2004	Complainants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
October 6, 2004	Order Designating Hearing Officer and Notice of Scheduling Conference
October 15, 2004	Qwest’s Opposition to Counties’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
October 21, 2004	Scheduling Order
December 1, 2004	Direct Testimony of Bill Thomas Peters
December 1, 2004	Direct Testimony of Eckhardt Arthur Prawitt
December 1, 2004	Affidavit of Eckhardt Arthur Prawitt
February 22, 2005	Qwest’s Motion for Summary Judgment
February 22, 2005	Affidavit of Philip E. Grate Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C
March 22, 2005	Scheduling Order
March 31, 2005	CCS’s Response to Qwest’s Motion for Summary Judgment Exhibit A
March 31, 2005	Affidavit of Eckhardt Prawitt
March 31, 2005	Complainant’s Memorandum in Opposition to Respondent’s Motion for Summary Judgment Exhibits
April 21, 2005	Reply Memorandum in Support of Qwest’s Motion for Summary Judgment
May 12, 2005	Order Granting Motion for Summary Judgment
June 17, 2005	Order Granting Motion for Summary Judgment